IN THIS ISSUE (Table of Contents)
1. "Youth Coaching Network" Newsletter Update
T
ogether
E
veryone
A
chieves
M
ore
2. Feature Articles by Sport:
BASKETBALL: Drill of the Month – "11 Man Fast Break" – Coach Michael Wells
FOOTBALL: "Football Drills and More" - Coach Michael Roth"
SOCCER: "Referees are Soccer's Unsung Heroes" - Coach John Haydon
![]()
"Youth Coaching Network" Newsletter Update
Dear Fellow Coaches,
Summer seems to be coming a very quick end.
Time to start preparing for that first game of the autumn season.
Great addition to
the newsletter for football coaches. Basketball
is only a month or so away and great drills and coaching tips continue
to pour in.
Thanks to all the contributors. Please help
make this newsletter sucessful by contributing. You sure don't need to
be a professional
writer to take part.
Drop me an email if you'd like to become an author to this newsletter
"Swing Hard; In Case You Hit It"
Very Best,
Kelly P (Coach Kelly) Hanaway :-)
If you haven't already done so, please forward this
issue to one or two of your friends or fellow coaches. Thanks so much!
![]()
BASEBALL: " Everything
You Always Wanted to Know About All-star Selection
also known as: How do they select the All Star Team and why isn't my child
on it?"
- Coach Ken Gamble
Other than the draft very few things are
as controversial as the
selection of an all star team to represent
a league. Why is that? Well in
most cases only 12 or 13 players are chosen
to represent an entire league.
And at least half of the parents believe
that their child belongs on the all
star team. Now, they may not believe that
their child is an all-star but
they certainly know that their son or
daughter is at least as good as one of
the players they see selected to the team.
Well, he did out-hit that other
boy in the two games when they played
my son's team - didn't he? It is not
the first eight or nine players chosen
that are controversial (everyone
knows they belong) but rather the last
two or three. This is true in any
sport - just look at the selection process
for the 64 teams in the NCAA
basketball tournament.
There are two reasons that All-stars are selected: to honor those
who had outstanding seasons and also to
put together a team that will be
competitive with other teams in the areas
or regions where the all-star
competition is held. These two requirements
are not always the same when
selecting players for an All-star team.
The pitcher that may have won most
of his team's games may only be the fifth
best pitcher in the league which
means he probably will not pitch in all-star
games. Can he hit or catch?
If not, he probably will not be able to
contribute to the all-star team in
competition. Or the hitter that
hits .400 but is slow or strikes out a lot
may not be selected or may be passed over
for a fast .300 hitter who seldom
strikes out. In all-star games speed
is essential and a player who puts the
ball in play is preferred over a player
who strikes out often. Can he hit
the faster "all-star type" pitching?
A player who is on a last place team
may never get to see the better pitchers
in the league and therefore his
batting average may be inflated by 100
to 150 points. If he has a long
looping swing he may be able to hit slower
league pitching with power but he
is unlikely to hit the faster pitching
he will see in the all-star
tournaments. Does he get along well
with other players or is he constantly
bickering with the other players and coaches?
Is he disciplined? Does he
make the players around him look better
because of his play or does he
always blame everyone else for his own
mistakes? If he has played infield
all season can he, or is he willing, to
play in the outfield? Everyone
can't play in the infield in every game.
Another part of the controversy is that it seems that the managers'
or coaches' kids always seem to be selected.
That perception is probably
true. The managers are the ones that select
the all star teams so they
probably just vote for each other's kids
- right? If you read the selection
criteria below you will see that the league
frowns on any conspiracy among
managers or coaches to "fix" the all star
selection. Most leagues have
severe penalties for collusion among the
managers but it is doubtful
collusion could ever be proven or is ever
prosecuted. It is probably true
that some managers vote for other manager's
kids because they know the other
manager. Quite often just the opposite
probably happens, too. On the field
rivalries can cause bias against another
manager's child. The league tries
to see that neither of these scenarios
occurs but that the best players are
chosen irregardless of who their parents
are. Also, whether it is cause or
effect, the best players are usually sons
or daughters of coaches because
the coaches put in more time with their
own children or because they got
into coaching because they saw some ability
in their own child or because
league rules allow coaches' draft options
for their own child.
Another controversial aspect is that it always seems that the all
star manager has more players off his
own team than any other team. That is
almost always so. It would seem that since
his team came in first place that
they probably had better players overall
than other teams. Also, in most
leagues, the all-star manager usually
gets to choose a couple of players on
his own in addition to those selected
by ballot. He will usually choose
"position" players if he is lacking a
catcher or needs an extra pitcher. But
if not, he is more likely to choose someone
off his team since he knows
those players better or because he wants
their parent to help coach. In my
experience the managers I know have used
their "free" choices to choose
players (yes - usually off of their own
team) who may not have had the best
statistics or power or pitching ability
but rather were good TEAM players
who hustled and had good attitudes. A
team of all stars is not easy to coach
and a couple of kids who hustle and have
good team spirit can be
instrumental in having fun during those
long hot July practices and in
winning tournament games.
The manager is also at a disadvantage if he had a very good or
great regular season team. He may
have had six, seven or eight players off
of his team that are truly deserving of
being on the All-star team. At the
same time every other manager is trying
to get at least one or two players
from their regular season teams onto the
All-star team. The result is a
numbers crunch and compromises are usually
made. Usually all of the teams
will end up with at least one player on
the team and most teams will have
two players selected. That leaves
precious little room for players who were
third or fourth best on their own teams
but who were also in the top ten in
the league. They are usually left
out. Players on the second place team
usually suffer the most from this scenario.
In leagues where the teams are made up of multi-age players, great
younger players are often left off in
favor of older players with less
ability with the reasoning that the younger
players will have their chance
"next year". Is this correct? I
don't know but it is often included in the
thought process.
You may not agree with these criteria and they may or may not be the
proper criteria for all-star selection
but as long as the coaches choose the
players this is the way it will be done.
Most leagues adhere to a process very similar to this. I hope after
reading this that the process becomes
a little clearer. It is a compromise
and may not be a perfect method.
But, it beats a popularity contest like
Major League Baseball runs, and it allows
a League to honor those who played
well during the season and also be represented
well when they participate in
post season competitions.
Let me know what you think.
Ken Gamble
dsports@hiwaay.net
http://www.decatursports.com/
![]()
Also, he is the only player within the offensive structure that has
to juggle his
responsibilities, both as a passer and as a scorer. It is, to varying
extents, the other four players jobs on the floor to create scoring opportunities
for themselves, the point guard must make sure that his attempts to score
are not coming at the expense of his teammates. In other words, he has
to score without disrupting the flow of the offense or “freezing” out his
teammates. Therefore, he is faced with juggling the ultimate paradox: reaction
vs. thought. He must constantly think about what is best for the team in
the given situation—i.e. the score, the quarter, the time remaining, which
players are on the floor, etc—controlling his natural reactions to the
events around him. He can never do just one or the other. If he thinks
and does not react, then he is nothing more than a robot running his team
through their offense. If he reacts and does not think, he is a mindless
drifter who has no idea what is going on around him. However, the point
guard can also be the most satisfying of the five positions, given that
he is able to most fully exert his will upon that of the team; he is in
control. By the very nature of the demands of his position, the ball is
in his hands more often than it is not, and he can therefore act as an
integral part of his team’s success. Much like a quarterback in football,
he must be the most aware of all elements of the game. Because of that,
he also stands to gain substantial glory if his team succeeds.
This above information is a continuing piece and each month we will insert a few more positions and their responsibilities. Or if you’d prefer, check out our web site for full details. (this section is in the “Basketball Practice” sub page. Have Fun!!!!
Yours In Sports,
Matt Swanick
SportsAssistant.com
![]()
(1) The drill begins with a regular 3 on 2 situation.
(2) When a shot goes up all 5 players in the 3 on 2 group go after the basketball. Whoever secures the ball outlets to the outlet man. When making the outlet pass you fill the lane of the side of the floor of the outlet pass. The rebounder and the two outlet players now go on a 3 man fastbreak toward the other basket.
(3) The 4 players who are left (on the previous 3 on 2 fastbreak) locate in either an outlet spot or stay in the lane area and play defense - 2 players will go to the outlet spots and 2 players will stay on defense.
(4) The outlet man who receives the pass from the rebounder will dribble the ball hard up the floor toward the middle lane - as shown in diagram B. The outlet man who does not receive the ball will sprint the far lane. We now have a 3 on 2 going the other way. The drill runs continuous, following the above rules.
http://www.footballdrills.com
OBJECTIVE:
To teach defensive linemen to react and recognize different blocking schemes.EQUIPMENT:
BallDRILL DETAILS:
1. Three OL align along the line of scrimmage. Two DL line up on the other side.
2. The coach stands behind the Dl to hand signal the blocking scheme and to give the snap count and cadence for the OL.
3. The coach teaches the DL to watch the football and get off on the ball.
4. The DL react and read the offensive blocking schemes on the run.EMPHASIS:
- At the snap, the DL take a proper gap control step and reach the blocking scheme.
- The diagram's blocking scheme is the inside trap play.
1. At the RT reads the influence block by the OG, he immediately gets vision back to the inside and attacks the trapper using the wrong-shoulder technique.
2. The LT reads the pulling OG and attacks the back block by the OC.
![]()
Excellent SOCCER TIMES
article: A must read! http://www.soccertimes.com/oped/2000/aug08.htm
Please suggest a question you would
like to see here!
![]()
BASEBALL : Guest Coach Article
BASKETBALL : Guest Coach Article
HOCKEY: "Guest Coach Article
CHEER: Guest Coach Article
FOOTBALL: Guest Coach Article
SOCCER : Guest Coach Article
If any coaches out there would like to contribute
as guest authors (or in any other way), please
email me at mailto:editor@teamanizer.com.
![]()